We recommend the following gear for the sport of canyoneering. We do not receive any direct compensation from these companies. We have reached our gear choices from decades of in-field use. Enjoy!

Metolius SafeTech Harness

Petzl Elios Helmet

Petzl PiranaPetzl Carabiners – Attache, Williams

Petzl Rescue Pulley

Sterling Rope Canyon Tech, TPR, and CIV Ropes

Sterling Rope Chain Reactor

Sterling Rope Hollow Block and Sewn Prusik

NRS Rock Pants

NRS Flux Drytop

NRS Wavelite Fleece Pants and Top

NRS Mystery Helmet Liner

SealSkinz Socks

5.10 Footwear – Savant, Insight, Runaway, Runamuck

In the future we will be posting specific gear reviews and expanding on the list. If you have specific questions about any of these gear options or any other gear options out there, then please contact us directly at info@alpinets.com.

Tagged with:
 

The West Coast Canyoneering Methodology (WCCM) was developed by Alpine Training Services in response to the growing need to collaborate innovative and proven technical safety systems with progressive industry related psychological training protocols. ATS combined these elements to create the safest & most effective canyoneering training protocol in the world!

Technical canyoneering originally began in Europe, but has quickly caught on in the U.S. By taking a close look at every known teaching style and safety record, one thing became inherently obvious — there had to be a better way! Understanding the multiple variables of technical canyoneering was key — the equipment, the technical applications that all lead to similar margins of safety, etc… The founders of the WCCM set out to look at the sport under a completely different light.

Psychological points of interest were the first issue to visit. We realized once the psychology of the sport was understood, the world’s technical rope and equipment systems would be subject to a new point of view. The next step was to create a system of measurement against every known existing aspect of risk management in the sport itself and related outdoor discilines such as creek boating and rock climbing. The acronym T.E.R.M. was created and became the foundation for this fresh new hybrid theory. ATS believes looking through “a new pair of glasses” will allow for a purely objective view of the sport. In turn, creating a fair assessment of what systems are good and need no adjustments versus what systems do not stand up to the “new style” delineated by T.E.R.M. As expected, through this review process, gaps became apparent where both psychology and technology had not yet bridged in in any outdoor vertical and or adventure risk activity. Designing methods to bridge these literal and theoretical gaps became the next step in the process.

We went back to the drawing board — contacting manufacturers for product development towards the sport and working with groups of outdoor professionals from other rope related & rescue disciplines. The final element of development towards the WCCM was to engage groups of outdoor professionals including psychologists, rope rescue instructors, government search & rescue training officers, swiftwater technicians and professional climbing instructors, and expose them all to our method of canyoneering and engage ourselves in this final process of discovery. The combined published results became the foundation for the final step — creating a flow chart of both technical and psychological training milestones embedded in our instructional training curriculum. This program is designed to enable a WCCM student to go from Canyoneering I: “The Beginning” to the empowered point of “Recreational Canyon Leader”, proving to be both technically and psychologically competent and accountable for themselves and for others, including other beginners. The final result was the creation of our training course program designed to move our clients along at their own pace, including free class shadowing for students of the WCCM as a C.E. (Continued Education). ATS is the first company to offer a C.E. based program. Our accomplished training methods have raised the industry standard in the U.S. which all other canyoneering schools now seek to achieve.

The end result — a higher level of efficency and effectiveness towards safety in canyoneering. Safety for the instructors, clients and end users after training including a platform for CE in similar sports. Since ATS also provides an industry standardized full service Kayaking School, Rock Climbing School and Mountaineering School each of these established disciplines now add value to the canyoneering curriculum to be known as the WCCM.

The founder of ATS, Darren Jeffrey comments on the innovative process:

The lack of thought and continuity between the technical and psychological training methods, especially in Europe, always fascinated me. With well over 20 years of personal climbing and canyoneering experiences, and hundreds of hours of professional training from various organizations, canyoneering continues to impress me as the most technically challenging vertical adventure risk sport. That being said, the physical limitations are much less than the limitations of other vertical adventure sports such as mountaineering or rock climbing. Coupled with the internet and real time information that the climbing world did not have in its’ beginning, we have a “super nuke” of a sport on our hands. In the end, this means more people can and will get the training and be out there on their own. Which in a short time has created a sport that has potential to grow larger and faster than climbing could or did. Canyoneering faces the same issues as climbing does. Access being of top concern, anchors, styles and ethics etc. If we are wise we will learn the short cuts through these issues and not have to relive the pains of the past!

Here is a simple outline covering a few of the psychological safety points of the West Coast Canyoneering Methodology.

Safety: Understanding T.E.R.M. and its’ dynamic applications.
Accountability: Understanding personal motive.
Awareness: Understanding what is happening with you and with others.
Communication: Learning the value of effective and efficient communication.
Control: Identifying and utilizing the proper technical systems for each obstacle. e.g. short roping and setting a tagline in deepwater or currents.
Training: Creating a venue for existing skillsets to be expanded including C.E. e.g. we offer free course shadowing for all canyon classes.
Teaching: Empowering WCCM students to pass on this methodology to others. e.g. part of our Recreational Trip Leader class is to have C-VI students work with actual beginners under close ATS supervision as guest helpers for C-I programs.
Becoming trained in the WCCM will build technical competency and core mental confidence, creating a well rounded canyoneer capable of having a knowledgeable response to any situation as it arises.

Alpine Training Services has a dedicated instructional canyoneering program which includes direct training, written field evaluations, a student text book, dozens of tracked “homework” based canyon days all undercut with our industry leading free class shadowing program and assigned mentor training. All of these features are designed to empower our clients to get trained, and be out there enjoying the canyons of the world as often as possible!

Tagged with:
 

WCCM Canyoneering Rating and Difficulty System

As canyoneering continues to grow in popularity the need for a difficulty rating system has emerged just as it did for rock climbers years ago. ATS has developed a methodology for canyoneering called the West Coast Canyoneering Method or WCCM. The WCCM is a make up of existing traditional approaches and evolved techniques and systems combined. The need to expand on the existing rating system is based on the wider range and types of canyon routes being established now compared to the desert type “slot canyons” that stereotyped the image of the sport in the early days. Desert canyons are quickly becoming just a small part of the established canyon routes nationally and worldwide. ATS has been a component for the pioneering and establishing of routes across the west coast including the Sierra Nevada range, Arizona, Southern California desert and mountain regions, and Hawaii. The WCCM rating system was conceived in the early 2000′s as an evolution of the popular Yosemite Decimal System that rock climbers currently use to grade routes in the United States. Although there are several rating systems in use in the United States for climbers (YDS, Alaskan), the Yosemite Decimal System continues to be the preferred choice. As such, ATS felt it would be a natural and uncomplicated step to have a comparable rating system for canyoneers to use.

As with all types of rating systems, this one is designed to assist a group and its leaders in assessing and matching the skill levels of each canyon descent member against the obstacles in the canyon. Never rely solely on a canyon difficulty rating or a route description as routes change and the perception of the individual’s establishing and rating the route may be different than your own. In addition, there are multiple ratings systems in use for canyoneering around the globe that all share similarities, but posses key differences.  Do your homework on which rating system you are using, talk with folks who have recently done the route using message boards, call or e-mail an instructor or guide to verify conditions and ratings. Information is virtually non-exhaustive. A good canyon leader will do everything in his or her power to become and stay informed to past, current and expected conditions. Due diligence is only a small part of this puzzle. Professional training, proper equipment, group size management, mindsets, time of year, etc… are all contributing factors for success or failure. Be safe and then have fun!

Canyon Classifications:

Class 1: A canyon that can be traveled in either direction (i.e. up or down) and most times of the year, usually along a streambed on an established trail. No commitment, no real exposure to water, no technical gear required.

Class 2: Again a non-committing canyon which can be traveled in either direction, mostly “off trail hiking” with some route finding skills needed to possibly stay dry or skirt larger obstacles. No technical equipment needed.

Class 3: Again a canyon route that can be traveled in either direction. Substantial route finding and climbing / boulder hopping skills needed to ascend or descend. Deep wades, small swims may be possible along with exposed down climbs followed by additional sections of class 2. A group harness and small rope may be a smart item to bring in the event of an injury.

Class 4: A committing and technical canyon route to be descended with various specialized rope systems, down climbing, swimming, deep wades along with teamwork skills. Typically once the rope is recovered form the first rappel the group is committed to a “descent only” egress. A serious approach to Time Energy and Risk management is necessary. Special attention to layering systems as often exposure to cold water is unavoidable.

Class 5: An extremely committing canyon route with all the tributes of a class 4 canyon route combined with the additional skillsets needed for lead and aid climbing. Technical pothole escapes, tricky lead climbs for egress, or any other difficult obstacle that would require the use of climbing and belaying skills. A class 5 canyon is an expert canyon usually attempted by a smaller group of competent canyoneer’s.

The Water Ratings:

Water or flow rates vary from canyon to canyon, time to time, storm to storm and year to year! Calling a canyon class “C” because there is water flowing through it is too vague for our standards! Detailing a canyon by any amount of water flow should be done on more of a case by case. Our water flow rating system is a conditional measurement. Not a set rating!

Class A: Virtually dry conditions. (“Seasonal” pools of water may exist)

Class B: Minor to moderate water flow rates with deep wades and or swims.

Class C*: Heavy flow rates. Class “C” conditions have difficult and dangerous hydraulic scenarios. Strong swimming skills and rope setting skills needed to safely negotiate the watercourse.

*Note: For a route to qualify as a class “C” canyon it must posses at the time of descent hazardous currents that a leader must swim against to set up swift water or class “C” rope systems. The amount of CFS running in a canyon is not an indicator of a class “C” as every canyon has the capacity to drain water at different levels. If you are swimming, the route is not necessarily a class “C” conditional rating by default.

Class F: A canyon that has been exposed to fire. Mud slides, rock fall, burned out root systems of trees and bushes, debris dams make for a dangerous condition. See many routes in Southern California as regular examples.

A class “A” canyon can become class “C” during a heavy rain, a class “C” canyon can become class “A” during a drought. Water flow ratings are so variable that they should only serve as part of your initial size up of the route. If you don’t have swiftwater skills, stay away from faster moving water filled canyon routes until you have received proper training. It only takes a small amount of water set with the perfect canyon topographical conditions to create a water hazard by definition. Use good judgment!

Time Commitment Ratings:

Grade I: Short roadside classics. 1-2 hours

Grade II: 2-4 hours

Grade III: Solid half day 5-7 hours

Grade IV: Long day 8-12 hours. Usually depending on group size, conditions and speed

Grade V: Two-day canyon, Bring more Red Bull!

Grade VI: A hypothetical rating for more than two days. Usually at this point the canyon crew will be aware of the canyon length and will have made all the necessary related decisions to manage the canyon T.E.R.M’s.

Danger Ratings:

Danger ratings are again hypothetical. It can be argued that any canyon could have sections of “R” or “X” ratings. True, but here we are talking about “unavoidable scenarios” the difference between a mandatory jump and not mandatory may be the lack of suitable anchor, etc… Body belays may protect the majority of the group but not the last one down. These ratings are simply designed to encourage the canyoneer to look deeper into the demands of the route. A danger rating describes unmanageable risks such as known hydraulic features, necessary jumps or dangerous slides.

R: A mistake at the wrong place or time will result in an unavoidable injury.
X: A mistake at the wrong place or time will result in an unavoidable death.

Example Ratings:

Class 3-B-III
Non committing, Wet, half day scramble

Class 4-C-V-R
Committing, Heavy water flow & current, Two day canyon with possible unavoidable hazards such as mandatory jumps, slides or swims

Class 5-C-VI-X
A committed advanced canyon route with heavy water flow & current, lead climbing required for egress or pothole escapes, multi-day with the possibility of unavoidable deadly obstacles or hazards

Tagged with:
 

Loading...